← Search

Justine Kraus

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fairfax, VA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
13 matches · 5W–8L · seasons 2022–2024
Match history13 matches
W
2024-08-21 · Team 5 Net Stalkers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alexei Haughom
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-16 · Team 5 Net Stalkers · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Ospina
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2024-08-12 · Team 5 Net Stalkers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Ospina
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2024-07-30 · Team 5 Net Stalkers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Ospina
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-07-14 · Team 5 Net Stalkers · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sandra Ospina
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2022-06-18 · Team 4 Net Assets. · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherry Schnabel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6
L
2022-06-16 · Team 4 Net Assets. · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherry Schnabel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 5-6
L
2022-06-14 · Team 4 Net Assets. · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherry Schnabel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2022-06-03 · Team 4 Net Assets. · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jaynelynn McCormick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-4
W
2022-06-02 · Team 4 Net Assets. · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jaynelynn McCormick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
L
2022-05-20 · Team 4 Net Assets. · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Spoorti Dandridge
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2022-05-17 · Team 4 Net Assets. · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sherry Schnabel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams3 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
8.0
38.5%
5W–8L · 48.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 77% of the time
#3 Doubles
77%
10 matches
#2 Doubles
15%
2 matches
#1 Doubles
8%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer