← Search

Eileen Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Purcellville, VA
4.0S year-end 2026
i
Self-rated, or a medical appeal
95 matches · 26W–69L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history95 matches
W
2026-03-11 · East - Over The Net · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kathleen Eickelberg
loading the estimate
7-5, 1-2
L
2026-02-25 · East - Over The Net · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jeanne Baily
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2024-03-27 · Over the Net · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jennifer East
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-01-24 · Over the Net · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Eve Weber
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 0-3
L
2023-04-12 · LGCC · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Theresa Crowley
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2023-04-11 · Team Carter · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Avinash Tripathi mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2023-03-01 · Over the Net Again · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susan Lombardi
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-4
L
2023-02-15 · Over the Net Again · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jill Poretz
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L
2022-12-04 · DeGioia · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Elona Novitski
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-5
L
2022-11-17 · DeGioia · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mekkla Thompson
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2022-11-03 · DeGioia · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cora Ho
loading the estimate
3-6, 7-6
L
2022-09-21 · Smith · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Dina Bessa
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams44 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
20%
2W–8L · 37.7% of games
4.0
21.7%
5W–18L · 42.7% of games
7.0
25%
1W–3L · 40.3% of games
7.5
28.6%
4W–10L · 43.8% of games
8.0
35.3%
12W–22L · 42.3% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 44% of games
7.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
27 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer