← Search

Lynn Holman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Amelia, OH
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 10W–33L · seasons 2019–2024
Match history43 matches
L
2024-05-29 · Queen City Teal · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Sanchez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-22 · Queen City Teal · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Jan Jordan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 3-6
L
2024-05-15 · Queen City Teal · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mellen Reckman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-05-01 · Queen City Teal · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Cynthia Conway
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
W
2023-07-13 · Lunken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Deborah Terry
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 6-2
W
2023-06-15 · Lunken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Susie Fegelman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 4-6, 2-0
L
2023-05-25 · Lunken · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patti Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-2
L
2023-05-18 · Lunken · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Lisa Schwartz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-22 · Queen City Teal · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Sophia McAllister
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2023-03-01 · Queen City Teal · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Sanchez
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2023-02-15 · Queen City Teal · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Dara Hudson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-3, 0-3
L
2022-07-14 · Lunken · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Alice Schadler
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2019–2024
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.0
60%
6W–4L · 52.3% of games
4.5
0%
0W–10L · 30.9% of games
8.0
17.4%
4W–19L · 39.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 42% of the time
#3 Doubles
42%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
14 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer