← Search

Chris Kelley

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wexford, PA
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 7W–20L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history27 matches
L
2026-08-08 · Oxford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Bechek
loading the estimate
1-6, 5-7
L
2026-08-01 · Oxford · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Billhimer
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Bechek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
L
2025-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Minicozzi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2025-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Minicozzi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 0-6
L
2025-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Bechek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
David McKain / Dennis Rafferty
2024-06-09 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Joe Billhimer
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 7-5
L
Steven Haught / Eric Campbell
2024-05-18 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Robert Kmetik
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 2-6
W
2023-07-29 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with William Yetsick
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2023-07-15 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Max Laun
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2022-08-13 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Patrick Strollo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
David McKain / John Scanlan
2022-08-07 · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with David Bechek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams2 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
8.0
26.9%
7W–19L · 37.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 82% of the time
#3 Doubles
82%
22 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
5 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer