← Search

Tanya Gacs

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
REDWOOD CITY, CA
4.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
17 matches · 10W–7L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history17 matches
W
2026-07-11 · ALPINE HILLS 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ann Jaquith championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-07-10 · ALPINE HILLS 55AW9.0A · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Kristine Avila championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-24 · ALPINE HILLS 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Anu Khatod
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-4
W
2026-05-10 · ALPINE HILLS 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Irene Otten
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-04-26 · ALPINE HILLS 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mia Banks
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
W
2026-03-21 · ALPINE HILLS 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ann Jaquith
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-02-07 · FOOTHILL COLL 40AW4.5A · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Mia Banks
loading the estimate
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-02-01 · FOOTHILL COLL 40AW4.5A · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Liza Geary
loading the estimate
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · FOOTHILL COLL 40AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Alicia van Fleteren
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-05-15 · HOLBROOK PK 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michele Lindzy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-4
W
2025-05-12 · HOLBROOK PK 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Michele Lindzy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-3
L
2025-05-04 · HOLBROOK PK 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Tracy Hogan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
80%
8W–2L · 60.6% of games
9.5
0%
0W–4L · 34.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 53% of the time
#3 Doubles
53%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
5 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova