← Search

Stacey Geis

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
San Mateo, CA
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
28 matches · 5W–23L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history28 matches
L
2026-05-24 · SHARON HTS CC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Robin Johnston
loading the estimate
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-05-02 · SHARON HTS CC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sisine Mercado
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-04-19 · SHARON HTS CC 55AW9.0A · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lauren Denenberg
loading the estimate
1-6, 0-6
L
2026-04-04 · SHARON HTS CC 55AW9.0A · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Vivian Gunnerengen
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-03-07 · SHARON HTS CC 40AW4.5A · #1 Singles · 4.5
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-22 · SHARON HTS CC 40AW4.5A · #2 Doubles · 4.5 · with Amy Grenier
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-10-05 · MENLO ATHERTON HS CW8.5A · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Sarah Tomita
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-24 · Wonder Women LV++ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Hazel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 0-6
L
2024-06-10 · Wonder Women LV++ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Hazel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 1-6
L
2024-05-20 · Wonder Women LV++ · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Kim Hazel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 4-6
L
2022-01-19 · PENINSULA GCC 18MX8.0A · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mason Ford mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2021-08-24 · PENINSULA GCC 18MX8.0A · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Mason Ford mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-3, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams16 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.5
27.3%
3W–8L · 43.9% of games
8.0
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
8.5
50%
2W–2L · 54.5% of games
9.0
0%
0W–4L · 24.6% of games
8.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 44.7% of games
9.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 32% of the time
#2 Doubles
32%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
25%
7 matches
#1 Singles
18%
5 matches
#2 Singles
14%
4 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I don’t want to be somebody else. I want to be myself and win in my way.
Rafael Nadal