← Search

Carla Hively

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charleston, WV
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
45 matches · 22W–23L · seasons 2018–2025
Match history45 matches
L
2025-08-23 · YMCA Parker · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with LaDonna Tackett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-08-07 · YMCA Parker · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with LaDonna Tackett
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-04-27 · TIC Hughes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Cooke
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W
2024-03-23 · TIC Hughes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ashlee Cooke
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2024-03-09 · YMCA Parker · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cochran
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2024-02-11 · TIC Hughes · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kristin Warner
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-01-13 · TIC Hughes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sharon Seidler
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
W
2023-10-07 · TIC Hughes · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jamie Tridico
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2023-05-07 · YMCA Osborn · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with McKay Mignault
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-05-06 · TIC Mabe/Hoh · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lisa Hughes
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2023-03-26 · YMCA Osborn · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Karen Cochran
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-0
W
2023-03-25 · TIC Mabe/Hoh · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Caroline Green
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams18 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
60%
3W–2L · 50% of games
4.0
50%
18W–18L · 50.2% of games
7.0
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 33% of the time
#1 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
15 matches
#3 Doubles
33%
15 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe