← Search

Jason Cousar

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Memphis, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
86 matches · 63W–23L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history86 matches
W
2026-10-22 · Hudson/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with John Gardner
loading the estimate
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-21 · Hudson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 4.5 · with Tyler Darby
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-10-12 · Hoehn/Memphis · #1 Singles · 4.0
loading the estimate
6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-15 · Melton/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Melton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-6
W
2026-09-01 · Melton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Scott Melton
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-4
L
2026-08-29 · Melton/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kells Hecht
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 4-6
L
2026-08-19 · Johnson/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jonathan Jussely
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
2026-08-09 · Melton/Memphis · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Kells Hecht
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-18 · Philips/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mark Gagliano championship
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-17 · Philips/Memphis · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Philips championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-07-17 · Philips/Memphis · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Steven Philips championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-06-20 · Philips/Memphis · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jerry Vaughn championship
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
75%
33W–11L · 59.9% of games
4.5
64.7%
11W–6L · 52% of games
7.5
90%
9W–1L · 62.7% of games
8.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 51.3% of games
4.0mixed
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 27% of the time
#3 Doubles
27%
23 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#2 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#1 Singles
14%
12 matches
#4 Doubles
8%
7 matches
#2 Singles
7%
6 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert