← Search

Joshua Woods

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Bristol, TN
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
85 matches · 40W–45L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history85 matches
L
2026-06-21 · Taylor-Woods/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Pope championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-20 · Taylor-Woods/META · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Pope championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-19 · Taylor-Woods/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Pope championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-19 · Taylor-Woods/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Pope championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2026-05-13 · Taylor-Woods/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Benjamin Croux
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-05-10 · Taylor-Woods/META · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Daniel Unger
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-3
L
2026-04-29 · Taylor-Woods/META · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jeffrey Miller
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
W
Ricky Marks / Devesh Patel
2025-06-20 · #4 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Jackson championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
Ben Dunn / Justin Brynn
2025-06-19 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with David Jochetz championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-05-06 · WNCJ Jackson (HRC) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jonathan Jackson
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2025-04-22 · WNCJ Jackson (HRC) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bennett Miller
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
W
2025-04-01 · WNCJ Jackson (HRC) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with James Wilson
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams49 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
4.0
53.1%
26W–23L · 51% of games
4.5
16.7%
3W–15L · 32% of games
7.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 59.9% of games
8.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 52.1% of games
9.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
18 matches
#4 Doubles
6%
5 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams