← Search

Chad Rakos

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Forest, VA
3.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
42 matches · 26W–16L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history42 matches
W
2025-11-30 · OCC - Bell - Consistency Counts · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Evans mixed
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2025-11-16 · OCC - Bell - Consistency Counts · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Evans mixed
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
L
2025-11-08 · OCC - Bell - Consistency Counts · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Rakos mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 2-6, 0-1
W
2025-10-25 · OCC - Bell - Consistency Counts · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emily Evans mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2025-10-22 · OCC - Bell - Consistency Counts · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Rakos mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-0, 1-0
W
2025-10-18 · OCC - Bell - Consistency Counts · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janika Carey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2025-10-15 · OCC - Bell - Consistency Counts · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Janika Carey mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 6-1
L
2025-03-01 · CAC Love - DeuceBags · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allison Rakos mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 0-6
W
2025-01-26 · CAC Love - DeuceBags · #3 Doubles · 8.0 · with Emily Evans mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-1
W
2024-12-14 · CAC Chawla - Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Love mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2024-12-08 · CAC Chawla - Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Rachel Love mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-11-23 · CAC Chawla - Dream Team · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Allison Rakos mixed
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
4.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 38.4% of games
7.0mixed
100%
4W–0L · 70.8% of games
7.5mixed
70.4%
19W–8L · 56% of games
8.0mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
16 matches
#3 Doubles
29%
12 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
11 matches
#2 Singles
7%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova