← Search

Missy Barrow

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Farmville, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
112 matches · 79W–33L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history112 matches
W
2026-06-20 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Josie Ottaviani championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-19 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzan Martin championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-06-18 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzan Martin championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 3-6
L
2026-06-18 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Suzan Martin championship
loading the estimate
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-05-11 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sangita Tewari
loading the estimate
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-05-04 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sangita Tewari
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-05-03 · BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sangita Tewari
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-4
W
2026-04-27 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sangita Tewari
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-0
W
2026-04-18 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Jill Davis
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-04-14 · BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sangita Tewari
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-03-29 · BCC-High (40s 4.0W SP) Aging Aces · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sangita Tewari
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-4
L
2026-03-24 · BW Mayo/Whitley (4.0 55s W) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michele Mayo
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams32 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 60.4% of games
3.5
25%
1W–3L · 48.8% of games
4.0
70.7%
29W–12L · 60% of games
7.5
60%
3W–2L · 58.5% of games
8.5
76.9%
20W–6L · 61.3% of games
9.0
50%
2W–2L · 47.5% of games
4.0mixed
100%
5W–0L · 71.4% of games
4.5mixed
60%
3W–2L · 60% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 65% of games
8.5mixed
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 55.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 64% of the time
#1 Doubles
64%
72 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
31 matches
#3 Doubles
8%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer