← Search

Matthew Fox

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Clemson, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
188 matches · 117W–71L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history188 matches
L
2026-10-25 · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Duncan Hogg championship
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-21 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Kevin Turner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · #1 Doubles · with Rodger Coubrough
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
L
2026-09-18 · #1 Doubles · with Andrew Pettus
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-09-13 · UPTA40C/Markham/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with David Keen
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-4
L
2026-09-09 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-22 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Benjamin Aikens
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-3
L
2026-08-22 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with RAJ DAVE
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-15 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Daniel Dukes
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-12 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Duncan Hogg
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-08-09 · UPTA40C/Markham/Brookstone · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Brian Gibson
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-08-08 · UPTA18C/Brown/Brookstone · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Stephen Brown
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams46 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
2.5
73.3%
11W–4L · 59.1% of games
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 58.3% of games
3.5
81.2%
26W–6L · 63.8% of games
4.0
48.3%
14W–15L · 52.1% of games
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 38.4% of games
6.5
91.7%
11W–1L · 69.5% of games
7.5
58.3%
14W–10L · 53% of games
8.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.8% of games
3.5mixed
75%
12W–4L · 58.7% of games
4.0mixed
31.8%
7W–15L · 43.2% of games
4.5mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 34% of the time
#1 Doubles
34%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
59 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
51 matches
Singles
3%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches
#2 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The moment of victory is much too short to live for that and nothing else.
Martina Navratilova