← Search

Rob Knapp

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Greenville, SC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
193 matches · 116W–77L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history193 matches
L
2026-09-19 · UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sidney Key
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-29 · UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emory Eastin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-08-22 · UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Sidney Key
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 7-6
W
2026-08-15 · UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Emory Eastin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-08-08 · UPTA18C/Gray/Kroc · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Jackson Holt
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-30 · UPTA40M/Knapp/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Kimey Kyker mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-06-16 · UPTA40M/Knapp/Kroc · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-06-14 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Samuel Moretz Chapman championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-06-13 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray) · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Reilly Amason championship
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-4
L
2026-06-12 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Jacques championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-12 · UPTA (A) 4.0M 18 & Over (Gray) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Matthew Jacques championship
loading the estimate
6-3, 1-1
L
2026-06-02 · UPTA40M/Knapp/Kroc · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Debbie Watson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams50 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
3.0
75%
6W–2L · 51.2% of games
3.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
59.5%
50W–34L · 53.7% of games
4.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.7% of games
7.5
66.7%
28W–14L · 54.6% of games
8.5
55.6%
5W–4L · 53.2% of games
4.0mixed
77.8%
7W–2L · 61% of games
7.0mixed
22.2%
2W–7L · 47.9% of games
8.0mixed
62.5%
15W–9L · 53.1% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 34% of the time
#3 Doubles
34%
66 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
63 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
55 matches
#2 Singles
2%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova