← Search

Marjorie Gale

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Underhill, VT
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
43 matches · 23W–20L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history43 matches
L
2026-09-26 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Laramee championship
loading the estimate
4-6, 5-7
L
2026-07-18 · ESB:Smashing Aces:Roberts/Neuert · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Williams
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-05-09 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Bouyea
loading the estimate
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-03-14 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Sarah Brown
loading the estimate
6-7, 2-6
L
2025-08-09 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Sherburne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
W
2025-07-07 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Cynthia Sherburne
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2024-08-03 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Janis Bark
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L
2024-06-30 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Bouyea
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-22 · EE:String Theory:Gale/Demas · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Carol Bouyea
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-2
W
2023-08-16 · ESB:Baseline Boomers:Van Kleeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Faith Hadden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-2
W
2023-07-31 · ESB:Baseline Boomers:Van Kleeck · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Allyson Bolduc
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2023-07-22 · EE:Dare Doubles:Gale/Van Kleeck · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Ann Laramee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.5
82.4%
14W–3L · 65.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
22.2%
2W–7L · 42.4% of games
8.0
40%
6W–9L · 46.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 61% of the time
#1 Doubles
61%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
21%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
8 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King