← Search

Sean Miller

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Arthur, IL
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
254 matches · 109W–145L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history254 matches
L
2026-11-01 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Pope mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-11-01 · MSIL 6.5 Fall Combo Mixed Hogan-Decatur · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Pope mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-7, 1-0
L
2026-10-18 · MSIL 9.0 Mixed 55&O Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sally Mangina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 2-2
L
2026-10-18 · MSIL 9.0 Mixed 55&O Bloomington · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sally Mangina mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Michael Gross
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-10-04 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Kettering
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-27 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Henneberg
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-09-27 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Brett Henneberg
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-09-13 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Taylor Nave
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-07-13 · MSIL A18&O 4.0M Castro-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Lijian Zhang
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-29 · MSIL A18&O 4.0M Castro-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Francesco Botticella
loading the estimate
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-06-22 · MSIL A18&O 4.0M Castro-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Patrick Hammie
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams65 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level11 levels played
3.0
80%
4W–1L · 54.5% of games
4.0
47.9%
23W–25L · 50.8% of games
6.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
7.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
8.5
16.7%
1W–5L · 34.3% of games
6.5mixed
60.8%
31W–20L · 54.4% of games
7.0mixed
58.7%
27W–19L · 56% of games
7.5mixed
41.4%
12W–17L · 44.5% of games
8.0mixed
16.7%
5W–25L · 40.9% of games
9.0mixed
6.2%
2W–30L · 28% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 45% of the time
#1 Doubles
45%
115 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
78 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
61 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova