← Search

Todd Kettering

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Mc Lean, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
98 matches · 35W–63L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history98 matches
L
2026-10-11 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Miller
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2026-10-04 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean Miller
loading the estimate
6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-27 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mark Killick
loading the estimate
6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L
2026-09-13 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Black Dragon Tennis Society · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brett Henneberg
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-08-01 · MSIL A40&O 3.5M Mean Machine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Conway
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-09 · MSIL A40&O 3.5M Mean Machine · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Conway
loading the estimate
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
L
2026-06-14 · MSIL A40&O 3.5M Mean Machine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Craig Conway
loading the estimate
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-07 · MSIL A40&O 3.5M Mean Machine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nicholas Troehler
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-05-14 · MSIL A40&O 3.5M Mean Machine · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Siembab
loading the estimate
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-10-19 · MSIL Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Black Dragon Tennis Soc · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Mark Miller
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
W
2025-09-21 · MSIL Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Black Dragon Tennis Soc · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with John Delanois
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-2
L
2025-08-28 · MSIL Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Black Dragon Tennis Soc · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Brett Henneberg
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams24 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
39.1%
18W–28L · 44.9% of games
4.0
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 48.5% of games
7.5
50%
2W–2L · 39.2% of games
6.0mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 43.8% of games
6.5mixed
33.3%
4W–8L · 47.7% of games
7.0mixed
21.4%
3W–11L · 39.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 57% of the time
#2 Doubles
57%
56 matches
#1 Doubles
25%
24 matches
#3 Doubles
14%
14 matches
Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is mostly mental. You win or lose the match before you even go out there.
Venus Williams