← Search

Yannick Kluch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Champaign, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
31 matches · 12W–19L · seasons 2024–2026
Match history31 matches
L
2026-11-01 · MSIL 7.5M Fall Combo Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Geoffrey Lin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-10-18 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Tri-Level Castro-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Mauro Martinez
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-10-11 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Tri-Level Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francesco Botticella
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-10-04 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Tri-Level Castro-Champaign · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Noel Castro
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-10-04 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Tri-Level Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Francesco Botticella
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-27 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Tri-Level Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Erik Siembab
loading the estimate
5-7, 4-6
W
2026-09-27 · MSIL 3.0/3.5/4.0M Tri-Level Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Mauro Martinez
loading the estimate
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-05-10 · MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Hans Dee
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-04-19 · MSIL Men's Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Slava Cazacu
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2025-10-12 · MSIL Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Lorenzo Vergari
loading the estimate
0-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-08 · MSIL Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Castro-Champaign · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jay Rafi
loading the estimate
2-6, 5-7
L
2025-09-04 · MSIL Tri-Level 3.0/3.5/4.0 Castro-Champaign · #2 Doubles · 2.5 · with Gaston Suardiaz
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2024–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
2.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0
40%
2W–3L · 45.5% of games
3.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 49.6% of games
4.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
41.7%
5W–7L · 45.4% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 48% of the time
#2 Doubles
48%
15 matches
#1 Doubles
26%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
6 matches
Singles
7%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer