← Search

Jan Frank

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 26W–66L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history92 matches
W
2026-07-24 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Rubenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Jackson
loading the estimate
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Rubenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dzintra Barnhard
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-10 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Rubenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Holden
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-26 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Rubenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dzintra Barnhard
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
L
2026-06-19 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Rubenstein · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Kempsell
loading the estimate
0-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-12 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Rubenstein · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Holden
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-06-05 · Indy A55 7.0W D IRCD Rubenstein · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kelley Holden
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-08-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Dixie Covert
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-04 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Kelley Holden
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 6-2
L
2025-08-01 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Martha Jackson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-07-25 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tracy Domi
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2025-07-21 · #2 Doubles · 6.0 · with Michelle Witek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams7 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.0
31.5%
17W–37L · 41.6% of games
6.0
20%
2W–8L · 36.8% of games
7.0
25%
7W–21L · 35.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 41% of the time
#2 Doubles
41%
38 matches
#3 Doubles
36%
33 matches
#1 Doubles
22%
20 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

The mark of great sportsmen is not how good they are at their best, but how good they are at their worst.
Martina Navratilova