← Search

Janice Ohlson

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Wheaton, IL
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 10W–42L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history52 matches
L
2026-07-30 · NITA S 65WCDb Wheaton-Scott · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Cleveland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
L
2024-07-25 · NITA S 70W55b Wheaton-Ohlson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Bittner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
0-6, 4-6
W
2024-07-18 · NITA S 65CWDc Wheaton-Scott/Kapetaneas · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Cleveland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L
2024-07-09 · NITA S 70W55b Wheaton-Ohlson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Bittner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2024-06-20 · NITA S 65CWDc Wheaton-Scott/Kapetaneas · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Cleveland
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
L
2024-06-18 · NITA S 70W65a Vaughan-Patterson/Gruidl · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Lange
loading the estimate
2-6, 4-6
L
2024-06-13 · NITA S 70W55b Wheaton-Ohlson · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Kara Bittner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
L
2023-12-09 · NITA E 70W65a Vaughan (Patterson/Gruidl) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maryann Webb
loading the estimate
0-6, 2-6
L
2023-10-28 · NITA E 70W65a Vaughan (Patterson/Gruidl) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Darlene Stekl
loading the estimate
3-6, 2-6
L
2022-12-03 · NITA E 70W65a Vaughan (Patterson/Gruidl) · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patsy Patterson
loading the estimate
2-6, 1-6
W
2022-10-22 · NITA E 70W65a Vaughan (Patterson/Gruidl) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patsy Patterson
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2022-10-07 · NITA E 70W65a Vaughan (Patterson/Gruidl) · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Patsy Patterson
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams20 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0%
0W–5L · 26.3% of games
6.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0
18.2%
8W–36L · 37.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 46% of the time
#3 Doubles
46%
24 matches
#2 Doubles
31%
16 matches
#1 Doubles
23%
12 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King