← Search

Marisa Mancini

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Elmhurst, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
36 matches · 21W–15L · seasons 2021–2025
Match history36 matches
L
2025-02-22 · NITA W 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2025-02-01 · NITA W 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Karen Grasse
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 3-6
W
2024-11-16 · NITA E 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
L
2024-11-09 · NITA E 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Kuchan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 2-6
W
2024-10-19 · NITA E 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-2
W
2024-07-29 · NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Kuchan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2024-07-15 · NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Kost
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 6-5, 1-0
L
2024-07-08 · NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Pam Kuchan
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
W
2024-06-24 · NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Holly Kost
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-4
W
2024-06-13 · NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Lisa Ventrella
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
L
2024-06-03 · NITA S 70W55d Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 3-5
W
2024-04-20 · NITA W 70W55e Courts Plus-Bursch/Roth · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Roth
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-4, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams11 teams · 2022–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level1 level played
7.0
60%
21W–14L · 54.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 69% of the time
#2 Doubles
69%
25 matches
#3 Doubles
28%
10 matches
#1 Doubles
3%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Experience is a big word. I think it comes with time, and I have that.
Serena Williams