← Search

Becky Smith

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Geneva, IL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 15W–37L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history52 matches
L
2026-04-19 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Wang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-12 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kay Noonan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-29 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Julie Gervais
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-22 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Amy Wang
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
L
2026-03-08 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Mccue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-01 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Warner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 3-5
L
2026-02-08 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diann Bilderback
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-01 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Diann Bilderback
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-01-11 · NITA W 65CWc Vaughan-Brosnan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brenda Mccue
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2025-12-07 · NITA E 70W55f Vaughan-Sherman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Sherman
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-03 · NITA F 65CWb Vaughan-Brosnan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Barbara Warner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2025-11-01 · NITA E 70W55f Vaughan-Sherman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Kennedy
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams14 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
3.5
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
6.5
34.6%
9W–17L · 46.6% of games
7.0
26.1%
6W–17L · 39.3% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
23 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams