← Search

Nancy Sherman

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
HASLETT, MI
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
41 matches · 12W–29L · seasons 2023–2026
Match history41 matches
W
2026-10-28 · COE VanWieren FWL A40-3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Marcia Bratschi-Gresens
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-10-14 · COE VanWieren FWL A40-3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jill Mazzola
loading the estimate
6-1, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-16 · COE VanWieren FWL A40-3.0W · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Mary Bratschi-VanWieren
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-4
L
2025-12-07 · NITA E 70W55f Vaughan-Sherman · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Becky Smith
loading the estimate
3-6, 6-7
L
2025-11-03 · NITA F 65CWb Vaughan-Brosnan · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Jennifer Brosnan
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
W
2025-10-26 · NITA F 65CWb Vaughan-Brosnan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Donna Borse
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-19 · NITA F 65CWb Vaughan-Brosnan · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Ann Fell
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-4
L
2025-10-04 · NITA E 70W55f Vaughan-Sherman · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Julie Gervais
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-21 · NITA F 65CWb Vaughan-Brosnan · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Bittner
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-07 · NITA E 70W55f Vaughan-Sherman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Anna Marie Mastro
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-7, 1-6
W
2025-04-27 · NITA W 70W55b Vaughan-Sherman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kloberdanz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-17 · NITA W 70W55b Vaughan-Sherman · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Susan Kloberdanz
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-1, 7-5
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams15 teams · 2023–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
3.0
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5
20%
1W–4L · 34.7% of games
6.5
25%
4W–12L · 41.8% of games
7.0
29.4%
5W–12L · 35.6% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 42% of the time
#2 Doubles
42%
17 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
11 matches
#1 Singles
5%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova