Search

James Brown

Tigard, OR
3.0C year-end 2023
13 matches · 2W–11L · seasons 20192023
Where James sits
65
2.5
683
3.0
1159
3.5
856
4.0
395
4.5
67
5.0

James is one of 683 men at 3.0 in this cohort of 3225. Levels at or below 3.0 account for 23% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Teams5 teams · 2019–2023
MPRC-Broad
2023 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2023
MPRC-Nies
2023 Mixed 18 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2023
MPRC-Atkins
2023 Mixed 40 & Over · 7.0 Mixed
2023
WHRC-Lipke
2022 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2022
SHC-Hyde/Finley
2019 Adult 18 & Over · 3.5 Men
2019
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

James has played at 3.5, 3.0 across 3 seasons — 0 moves up and 1 down.

2.53.03.5201920222023

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2019, 2022 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
3.5
20%
2W–8L · 38% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history13 matches
W
2023-03-19 · MPRC-Broad · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tom Finnerty
+0.024better than expected — took 56% of games against 45% expected
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2023-02-19 · MPRC-Broad · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Morrissey
0.016below expectation — took 20% of games against 35% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2023-02-12 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Skoog
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 30% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2023-01-29 · MPRC-Broad · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Patrick Morrissey
0.021below expectation — took 14% of games against 33% expected
6-1, 6-1
L
2023-01-28 · MPRC-Atkins · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Ann Skoog
+0.000about as expected — took 29% of games against 28% expected
6-4, 6-1
L
Allison Fryman / Kevin Phammixed
2022-10-08 · MPRC-Nies · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rachel Nies
+0.000better than expected — took 38% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 7-6
L
2022-03-13 · WHRC-Lipke · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.013below expectation — took 29% of games against 40% expected
6-4, 6-1
W
N/A
2022-02-25 · WHRC-Lipke · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jeff Lipke
0.017better than expected — took 100% of games against 89% expected
6-0, 6-0
L
2022-01-22 · WHRC-Lipke · #1 Singles · 3.5
0.043below expectation — took 20% of games against 44% expected
6-1, 6-2
L
2022-01-15 · WHRC-Lipke · #2 Singles · 3.5
0.025below expectation — took 32% of games against 45% expected
6-0, 7-6
L
Dan Wolff / Todd Schwartz
2019-03-16 · SHC-Hyde/Finley · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jay Scroggin
+0.005about as expected — took 55% of games against 50% expected
2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
Shawn Boyce / Mahendra Shewalla
2019-03-09 · SHC-Hyde/Finley · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kurt Havnaer
0.009below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.