← Search

Jeffrey Yu

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
122 matches · 67W–55L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history122 matches
W
2026-07-23 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Dalton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Akers
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
W
2026-06-18 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCD Dalton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Akers
loading the estimate
7-5, 6-3
L
2026-05-17 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCE Dalton · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Akers
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-05-03 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCE Dalton · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Akers
loading the estimate
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-01 · Indy A55 7.0M IRCE Dalton · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Steve Dalton
loading the estimate
0-6, 1-6
W
2025-08-30 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Chop
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-08-07 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Roger Davis
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
W
2025-07-24 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Bert Nickelsberg
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
W
2023-08-03 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Jeff Akers
loading the estimate
6-7, 4-1, 1-0
L
2023-07-08 · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Elizabeth Yu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 4-6
W
2023-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Robert Tully
loading the estimate
6-4, 6-0
W
2023-07-05 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Troy Kafka
loading the estimate
7-6, 6-2
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams17 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
58.5%
24W–17L · 54.3% of games
7.0
83.9%
26W–5L · 61.1% of games
7.5
0%
0W–4L · 30.3% of games
7.0mixed
46.7%
14W–16L · 48.5% of games
7.5mixed
18.8%
3W–13L · 41% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 53% of the time
#1 Doubles
53%
65 matches
#2 Doubles
27%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer