← Search

Troy Kafka

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Fishers, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
99 matches · 66W–33L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history99 matches
W
2026-10-22 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Chop · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Schroeder
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-10-20 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE CSWC Mackison · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Eikenberry
loading the estimate
1-6, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-10-16 · Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Copeland · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrea Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-10-14 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Chop · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Lauck
loading the estimate
6-2, 7-6
L
2026-10-13 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE CSWC Mackison · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Todd Eikenberry
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-7
W
2026-10-02 · Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Copeland · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Tamara Kafka mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
2026-09-30 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Chop · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Drew Schroeder
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-09-29 · Indy A40 4.0M TUE CSWC Mackison · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Drew Schroeder
loading the estimate
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Chop championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-09-26 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Chop championship
loading the estimate
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-25 · Indy CX 6.5 IRCD Copeland · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Andrea Hoffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 1-4
L
2026-09-25 · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Keith Chop championship
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams9 teams · 2024–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
69.2%
9W–4L · 56.7% of games
3.5
71.4%
40W–16L · 56.3% of games
4.0
0%
0W–5L · 43.4% of games
6.5
80%
4W–1L · 59.6% of games
7.0
64.7%
11W–6L · 53.3% of games
6.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
44 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
37 matches
#3 Doubles
9%
9 matches
#1 Singles
8%
8 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe