← Search

Andrew Goth

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Indianapolis, IN
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
123 matches · 76W–47L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history123 matches
W
2026-10-14 · Indy C 6.5M IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Aaron Kremer
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L
2026-10-14 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Joe Copeland
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-7
W
2026-10-07 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with David Beebe
loading the estimate
6-3, 6-1
W
2026-09-15 · Indy C 6.5M IRCD Copeland · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Chris Ficklin
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-19 · Indy X18 7.0X IRCD Copeland · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Tashina Almand mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-16 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Derek Ozolins championship
loading the estimate
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Khalid Johnson
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-15 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anand Bala
loading the estimate
7-5, 5-2
L
2026-07-10 · Indy X18 7.0X IRCD Copeland · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Mariko Tsuyuki mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-07-08 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anand Bala
loading the estimate
2-6, 6-1, 1-0
W
2026-06-29 · Indy A18 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Taylor
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-06-24 · Indy A40 3.5M IRCD Singh · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anand Bala
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams21 teams · 2025–2027
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
80%
24W–6L · 67.7% of games
3.5
50%
17W–17L · 52.7% of games
6.5
92.3%
12W–1L · 67.6% of games
7.5
40%
2W–3L · 47.1% of games
6.0mixed
60%
6W–4L · 53.8% of games
6.5mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
47.1%
8W–9L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Singles, 24% of the time
#1 Singles
24%
29 matches
#2 Doubles
23%
28 matches
#1 Doubles
21%
26 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
22 matches
Singles
10%
12 matches
#2 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to take the initiative and play your game. Confidence is just believing you can do it.
Chris Evert