← Search

Judy Kobel

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
The Villages, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
171 matches · 67W–104L · seasons 2018–2026
Match history171 matches
L
2026-03-24 · Glenview Perkins · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Laura Flanagan
loading the estimate
6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-03-04 · Glenview Perkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Radzimski
loading the estimate
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-02-10 · Glenview Perkins · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Maricel Keiter
loading the estimate
4-6, 3-6
L
2025-05-06 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paula Federman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W
2025-04-22 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Kriek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 7-5
L
2025-04-15 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Lisa Baker
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 3-6, 0-1
W
2025-04-14 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Helen Wardell
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
W
2025-04-13 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Patricia Albrite
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 1-6, 1-0
W
2025-04-01 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nancy Kriek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-4, 6-4
L
2025-03-25 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paula Federman
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 2-6
L
2025-03-10 · Pelican Marsh / K. Victory · #1 Doubles · 7.0 · with Nancy Spiwak
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 4-6
L
2025-02-27 · Pelican Marsh / K. Victory · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with K VICTORY
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 3-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.5
36.4%
4W–7L · 47.2% of games
6.5
45.5%
5W–6L · 49.7% of games
7.0
33.6%
37W–73L · 45.8% of games
7.5
56%
14W–11L · 50.1% of games
8.0
37.5%
3W–5L · 43.9% of games
7.0mixed
66.7%
4W–2L · 49% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
78 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
52 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
41 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Tennis is a perfect combination of violent action taking place in an atmosphere of total tranquillity.
Billie Jean King