← Search

Helen Wardell

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Naples, FL
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
52 matches · 39W–13L · seasons 2022–2026
Match history52 matches
W
2026-05-04 · Pelican Marsh / Prentice · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Fiona Prentice
loading the estimate
6-1, 6-2
L
2026-04-27 · Pelican Marsh / Prentice · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stacey Mondragon
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-19 · Pelican Marsh / Dahm · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Rosie Renfro
loading the estimate
6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W
2026-03-05 · Pelican Marsh / Dahm · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Seymour
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-02-23 · Pelican Marsh / Elizabeth G · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Seymour
loading the estimate
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-02-19 · Pelican Marsh / Dahm · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Seymour
loading the estimate
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-02-09 · Pelican Marsh / Elizabeth G · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Seymour
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-01-20 · Pelican Marsh / Dahm · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Seymour
loading the estimate
3-6, 4-6
W
2026-01-12 · Pelican Marsh / Elizabeth G · #2 Doubles · 7.0 · with Barbara Seymour
loading the estimate
6-2, 6-0
W
2026-01-08 · Pelican Marsh / Dahm · #3 Doubles · 7.0 · with Gail Oroho
loading the estimate
5-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2025-04-29 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Margaret Caccia
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2025-04-14 · Pelican Marsh/DoublesToBubbles/ Kobel · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Judy Kobel
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-0, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams12 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level4 levels played
6.0
79.5%
31W–8L · 62.1% of games
6.5
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.0
50%
4W–4L · 52% of games
7.5
1W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 54% of the time
#1 Doubles
54%
28 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
14 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
10 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Start where you are. Use what you have. Do what you can.
Arthur Ashe