← Search

Dale Hall

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
4.5C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
19 matches · 17W–2L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history19 matches
W
2026-10-03 · MSchrimsher (Olde Providence) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Kane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W
2026-09-19 · MSchrimsher (Olde Providence) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Lisa Kane
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-22 · MSchrimsher (Olde Providence) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Nan Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 5-7
W
2024-05-17 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Leslie Peterson
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-2, 6-3
W
2024-04-06 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Gehrig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
W
2024-03-23 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Gehrig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-1
W
2024-03-02 · LPeterson (OPRC) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Gehrig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-05-14 · MNee (Sardis) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lin Su
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
1-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
2023-05-06 · MNee (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Monica Nee
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 7-6
L
2023-04-22 · MNee (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marta Schmitt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 5-7
W
2023-04-15 · MNee (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Marta Schmitt
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-0
W
2023-04-01 · MNee (Sardis) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Sharon Gehrig
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams8 teams · 2019–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
8.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
9.0
93.8%
15W–1L · 68.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 47% of the time
#1 Doubles
47%
9 matches
#2 Doubles
42%
8 matches
#3 Doubles
11%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova