← Search

Susan Eastman Tilsch

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Matthews, NC
4.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
30 matches · 11W–19L · seasons 2019–2025
Match history30 matches
L
2025-09-13 · DCato (Longview) · #3 Doubles · 8.5 · with Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 1-6
L
2025-09-06 · DCato (Longview) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Cynthia Frasier
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-17 · CFrasier/RSchuler (Longview) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Ruth Shaffner
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 1-6
L
2024-05-11 · CFrasier/RSchuler (Longview) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Frasier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 4-6
L
2024-03-30 · CFrasier/RSchuler (Longview) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Zuzana Bombardier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
5-7, 2-6
L
2024-03-02 · CFrasier/RSchuler (Longview) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Cynthia Frasier
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 0-6
L
2023-05-06 · RSchuler/APowers (Longview) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Jean Salisbury
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 2-6
L
2023-03-04 · RSchuler/APowers (Longview) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Riggins
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
4-6, 1-6
L
2023-02-25 · RSchuler/APowers (Longview) · #2 Doubles · 9.0 · with Mary Russo
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
2-6, 3-6
W
2022-06-04 · APowers/STilsch (Longview) · #3 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Riggins championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
Kathy Channell / Heidi Stevens
2022-06-03 · APowers/STilsch (Longview) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Lisa Riggins championship
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2022-04-30 · APowers/STilsch (Longview) · #1 Doubles · 9.0 · with Dora Burdzinska-Drezek
no estimate for this season
i
Our model did not follow this player through that season: none of their matches that season carried an individual NTRP level (55 & Over and combo leagues are rated on combined levels), so it had nothing to start from. The match still counts toward the USTA rating.
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams10 teams · 2019–2025
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level3 levels played
4.5
25%
1W–3L · 41.3% of games
8.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
9.0
41.7%
10W–14L · 44.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 40% of the time
#1 Doubles
40%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
30%
9 matches
#3 Doubles
30%
9 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams