← Search

Dora Burdzinska-Drezek

Charlotte, NC
4.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
150 matches · 71W–79L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Dora Burdzinska-Drezek to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history150 matches
L
2026-09-05 · NNeel (Charlotte Tennis) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Mollie James
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-08-15 · DWest (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 8.5 · with Irma Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 5-7
W
2026-08-05 · DWest (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 8.5 · with Irma Laney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-18 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-07-17 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
Michelle Brooks / Michelle Wheeler
2026-07-17 · #4 Doubles · with Nancy Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-15 · DWest/CWincek (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Cynthia Brinneman
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L
2026-07-09 · NSiens (Life Time) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Charles Manning mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-08 · CHelms/THolwager (Lifetime) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Bill Battaile mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 2-6
L
2026-06-20 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 1-6
W
Julie Kelly / Emily Cutts
2026-06-19 · #3 Doubles · with Nancy Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-19 · #2 Doubles · with Nancy Miller championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams55 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
0.0
1W–1L
not enough matches yet
4.0
63.6%
7W–4L · 60.7% of games
4.5
47.1%
24W–27L · 50.5% of games
8.5
50%
19W–19L · 49.6% of games
9.0
25%
1W–3L · 42.1% of games
4.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 45.7% of games
4.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 55.1% of games
8.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet
9.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 48% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 38% of the time
#2 Doubles
38%
57 matches
#3 Doubles
32%
48 matches
#1 Doubles
27%
40 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
2 matches
#1 Female Doubles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Losing is not my enemy. Fear of losing is my enemy.
Rafael Nadal