Nancy Miller
Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
321 matches · 204W–117L · seasons 2019–2026
Match history321 matches
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams85 teams · 2019–2027
CChildress (Queens)
CChildress (Queens)
CChildress (Queens)
CChildress (Park Road)
CChildress/Donoghue (Matthews)
CSpera (Blakeney)
CSpera (Blakeney)
DCato (Charlotte Tennis)
FOno/TGreen (Chestnut Square Park)
JBlack/TStamey (Matthews)
LEKR-Krogstie/Spartan Park 40s
LEKR-Krogstie/Spartan Park 55s
MCTA 4.0W 18 & Over (Schuler)
MCTA55/Riggins/RHTC
MWright (Blakeney)
RDrees/O'Rourke (Blakeney)
RDrees/RO'Rourke (Blakeney)
TGreen/FOno (Chestnut Square)
WParker (Queens)
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
6W–6L · 54.8% of games
4.0
69.2%
110W–49L · 58.6% of games
4.5
48.4%
15W–16L · 49.3% of games
7.5
69%
29W–13L · 56.3% of games
8.5
58.1%
36W–26L · 51.4% of games
4.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 47.4% of games
8.0mixed
75%
6W–2L · 60.1% of games
Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.
By lineusually #2 Doubles, 37% of the time
#2 Doubles
37%
118 matches
#1 Doubles
33%
106 matches
#3 Doubles
27%
87 matches
#1 Singles
1%
4 matches
#4 Doubles
1%
4 matches
#2 Singles
1%
2 matches
How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.
Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.