← Search

Naomi O'Brien

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
156 matches · 124W–32L · seasons 2024–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.63
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 40 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
5%
stay 3.5
95%
up to 4.0
Projected to December: 0% down · 41% stay · 59% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.52. Lower than today’s 3.63 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 3.5
16 of 56
NC · 3.5
34 of 112
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Naomi is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Naomi has played at 3.0, 3.5 across 3 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.53.03.5202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Naomi has gone from the 90th to the 94th percentile of players at that level, 2024 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level8 levels played
3.0
82.9%
29W–6L · 68.4% of games
3.5
80.6%
29W–7L · 64.8% of games
4.0
40%
6W–9L · 52.8% of games
4.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
6.5
88.2%
15W–2L · 63.1% of games
7.5
1W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
71.4%
5W–2L · 59.2% of games
4.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history156 matches
W
Tiffany Kopittke / Judith Skelton
2026-08-03 · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elizabeth Hall
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
L
Melissa Covington / Dana Adams
2026-07-27 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anait Balasanyan
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 6-4, 1-0
W
2026-07-16 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean O'Brien
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-4
W
Rachael Schuler / James Nicholsmixed
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Sean O'Brien
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 7-5
W
Christina Thigpen / Lynn Selland
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elly Tennyson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-2
W
Stephanie Parker / Megan Francis
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Virginia Papadopulos
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
Laura Warden
2026-06-29 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-3
W
Robert Marlowe / Paula Olivemixed
2026-06-26 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Chaffman
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-4
L
John Luney / Alexis Cochranmixed
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rafael Balderrama
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-7, 1-0
W
Amber Filingeri / Sarah Hawkins
2026-06-22 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Madelynn Bates
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
2-6, 6-4, 1-0
W
Caroline Donahue / Latha Baddigam
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Elly Tennyson
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
Julia Szurnickichamps
2026-06-13 · #2 Singles
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-0
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.