← Search

Stacey Whitney

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
301 matches · 174W–127L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
3.03.54.0lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.34
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 51 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 3.0
98%
stay 3.5
2%
up to 4.0

A 3.5 runs from 3.01 to 3.50. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 3.5
49 of 56
NC · 3.5
98 of 112
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Stacey is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Stacey has been 3.5 for all 5 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

3.03.520222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.5, Stacey has gone from the 86th to the 90th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level6 levels played
3.5
76.2%
77W–24L · 60.5% of games
4.0
35.9%
28W–50L · 45.4% of games
4.5
37.5%
3W–5L · 45.1% of games
6.5
68.8%
22W–10L · 57.3% of games
7.5
60.7%
17W–11L · 56.8% of games
3.5mixed
75%
3W–1L · 52.4% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history301 matches
W
Zahide Marenic / Gladys Shinmoto
2026-07-30 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Haskins
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-4
W
Mayela Magur / Sarah Hobert
2026-07-26 · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rongrong Wang
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 6-4
W
Christy ACEVEDO / Terra Dixon
2026-07-20 · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Karen Moss
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-3
W
Mayela Magur / Sarah Anderson
2026-07-19 · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wenxian Xu
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-0
W
Katie White / Jami Stone
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Sheehey
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-4
W
Allyson McDonough / Emily Pease
2026-07-15 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Madeline Jurch
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-02 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Nikki Haskins
−0.011about as expected — took 48% of games against 52% expected
4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · #3 Doubles · 4.5 · with Donna Musante
−0.008below expectation — took 25% of games against 35% expected
6-3, 6-1
W
Sharon Holland / Jennifer Hong
2026-06-29 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Nikki Haskins
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-0
L
Connie Arevalo / Christina Prejean
2026-06-25 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Sheehey
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W
Mary Oakley / Marisa Haehnlein
2026-06-23 · #2 Doubles · 4.0 · with Nikki Haskins
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-6, 6-1
W
Caroline Skjoedt / Rachel Miller
2026-06-11 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kim Sheehey
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.