Teams

MCTA18/Bhamidipati/RHTC

COMBO 18 & Over · 18 & Over Adult Women - 6.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.23 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 13 6:00 PM
Rock Hill Tennis Center
Sep 20 6:00 PM
Rock Hill Tennis Center
2026-08-30vs MCTA18/Anderson/TEGACLost 12
L#1 DoublesTeneika Funderburk / Viktoriia Kologryva vs Nancy Moll / Aurora Kurowski3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesStacey Whitney / Seung Hee Noh vs Mayela Magur / Sarah Hobert3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesNikki Haskins / Avani Bhamidipati vs Cynthia Hoover / Cathy Anderson6-4, 6-0
2026-08-16vs MCTA18/Anderson/TEGACWon 21
W#1 DoublesScarlett Cochran / Viktoriia Kologryva vs Nicole Badr / Sarah Hobert4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJackie Gyoerkoe / Stacey Whitney vs Jessica Ambrose / Terra Dixon6-1, 4-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSeung Hee Noh / Naomi O'Brien vs Laura Craft / Carrie Marlowe6-2, 6-2
2026-08-09vs MCTA18/Anderson/TEGACWon 21
L#1 DoublesNikki Haskins / Rongrong Wang vs Cynthia Hoover / Aurora Kurowski1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesSeung Hee Noh / Teneika Funderburk vs Christy ACEVEDO / Carrie Marlowe4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDevon Fuller / Naomi O'Brien vs Sarah Anderson / Cathy Anderson6-1, 6-1
2026-07-26vs MCTA18/Anderson/TEGACWon 30
W#1 DoublesAlexis Cochran / Wenxian Xu vs Christy ACEVEDO / Nicole Badr6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesStacey Whitney / Rongrong Wang vs Mayela Magur / Sarah Hobert6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesScarlett Cochran / Seung Hee Noh vs Jessica Ambrose / Terra Dixon6-1, 6-2
2026-07-19vs MCTA18/Anderson/TEGACWon 30
W#1 DoublesWenxian Xu / Stacey Whitney vs Mayela Magur / Sarah Anderson6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesTeneika Funderburk / Viktoriia Kologryva vs Cynthia Hoover / Laura Craft6-0, 6-1
W#3 DoublesNikki Haskins / Jackie Gyoerkoe vs Nancy Moll / Jessica Ambrose2-6, 7-5, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18 & Over Adult Women - 6.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1MCTA18/Bhamidipati/RHTC40102875
2MCTA18/Anderson/TEGAC0421021127

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Naomi O'Brien
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.46
Nikki Haskins
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.35
Stacey Whitney
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.34
Alexis Cochran
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.32
Devon Fuller
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.25
Rongrong Wang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
3.21
Viktoriia Kologryva
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.18
Wenxian Xu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
3.16
Scarlett Cochran
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.08
Teneika Funderburk
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.81
Seung Hee Noh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.79
Jackie Gyoerkoe
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.76
Avani Bhamidipati
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stacey Whitney + Teneika Funderburk111148% games+1.7% vs expected
Stacey Whitney + Nikki Haskins302255% games+1.7% vs expected
Teneika Funderburk + Nikki Haskins7949% games−0.6% vs expected
Scarlett Cochran + Alexis Cochran181552% games−0.7% vs expected
Wenxian Xu + Naomi O'Brien4159% gamesnot enough data
Wenxian Xu + Rongrong Wang4164% gamesnot enough data
Wenxian Xu + Avani Bhamidipati404 matchesnot enough data
Naomi O'Brien + Nikki Haskins213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Naomi O'Brien
134W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%46%54%
3.51
3.5
Nikki Haskins
153W–102L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%62%38%
3.46
3.5
Stacey Whitney
179W–136L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.35
3.5
Alexis Cochran
57W–34L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.34
3
Devon Fuller
96W–37L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%1%99%
3.32
3
Rongrong Wang
34W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.25
3
Viktoriia Kologryva
40W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%6%94%
3.21
3
Wenxian Xu
78W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%10%90%
3.18
3.5
Scarlett Cochran
74W–61L career · type A · 5 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
3.5
Teneika Funderburk
90W–110L career · 3 lines in 2026
30%70%<1%
3.08
3
Seung Hee Noh
38W–34L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.81
3
Jackie Gyoerkoe
45W–49L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.79
3
Avani Bhamidipati
32W–35L career · 1 line in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.