← Search

Scarlett Cochran

Waxhaw, NC
3.5A year-end 2025
i
Appeal — granted on request, not computed
139 matches · 76W–63L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Scarlett Cochran to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history139 matches
L
2026-09-09 · RJoplin (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Wooten Schmitz
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-09-04 · MCTA40/Byers/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nancy Moll
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 3-6
W
2026-09-02 · RJoplin (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bridget Happney
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-25 · MCTA40/Byers/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Stanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-08-17 · MCTA40/Bhamidipati/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Seung Hee Noh
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-1
W
2026-08-16 · MCTA18/Bhamidipati/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Viktoriia Kologryva
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L
2026-08-15 · MCTA18/Pruski/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Elly Tennyson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-10 · FBey/TFunderburk (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with FpommeFrances Pommells
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
W
2026-08-08 · MCTA18/Pruski/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Lauren Woodward
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-05 · RJoplin (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Renay Joplin
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-1
L
2026-08-01 · MCTA18/Pruski/RHTC · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Chelse Stevens
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-30 · MCTA40/Byers/RHTC · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Stephanie Stanton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams28 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0
60%
9W–6L · 53.5% of games
3.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 47.9% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 36.2% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 67.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
20W–10L · 54.2% of games
7.5
12.5%
1W–7L · 36.2% of games
3.5mixed
83.3%
10W–2L · 59.6% of games
4.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #2 Doubles, 45% of the time
#2 Doubles
45%
62 matches
#1 Doubles
32%
44 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
32 matches
#2 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Success is a journey, not a destination. The doing is often more important than the outcome.
Arthur Ashe