← Search

Nicole Badr

Waxhaw, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
185 matches · 97W–88L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Nicole Badr to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history185 matches
L
2026-09-03 · SChudgar (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Krystal Carmichael
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-08-20 · SChudgar (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Shefali Chudgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-08-16 · MCTA18/Anderson/TEGAC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sarah Hobert
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-27 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rafael Balderrama mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-26 · MCTA18/Anderson/TEGAC · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Christy ACEVEDO
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L
Megan Hua Shaul / Karen Allen
2026-07-16 · BDavis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-07-01 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
2026-06-29 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Zhen Zu mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 6-2, 0-1
L
2026-06-25 · MCTA 3.5M 18 & Over (Pavkov) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ajay Bhingare mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · BDavis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kim Gissy
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 4-6, 1-0
W
2026-06-15 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Chaffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-4
L
2026-06-10 · BDavis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams33 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level10 levels played
2.5
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.0
42.6%
23W–31L · 46.8% of games
3.5
33.3%
10W–20L · 45.5% of games
5.5
83.3%
10W–2L · 64.8% of games
6.5
54.2%
13W–11L · 54.6% of games
7.5
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
100%
8W–0L · 75% of games
3.5mixed
53.3%
8W–7L · 51.5% of games
6.0mixed
100%
13W–0L · 63.7% of games
7.0mixed
1W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 32% of the time
#3 Doubles
32%
60 matches
#2 Doubles
20%
37 matches
#1 Doubles
18%
33 matches
#2 Singles
10%
19 matches
#3 Singles
9%
16 matches
#1 Female Singles
7%
13 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova