← Search

Allison Purmort

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
135 matches · 60W–75L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Allison Purmort to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history135 matches
L
2026-09-09 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna T Heath
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-09-08 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Sison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · BBaker (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-08-26 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Tringali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kara Tringali
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-08-18 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-12 · BBaker (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Katherine Koppel-Dobbs
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
Jill Smith / Lee Steadman
2026-07-16 · BDavis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jessica Ambrose
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 7-5
W
2026-07-08 · BDavis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patty Ni
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-07-06 · APurmort (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Stone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 4-6
L
2026-06-10 · BDavis (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Nicole Badr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · APurmort (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Adam Doerr mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 0-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams31 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
57.1%
28W–21L · 53.9% of games
3.5
17.2%
5W–24L · 41.3% of games
6.5
54.3%
19W–16L · 52.9% of games
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
33.3%
2W–4L · 35.2% of games
6.0mixed
14.3%
1W–6L · 39.7% of games
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
60 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
33 matches
#2 Doubles
24%
32 matches
#2 Singles
4%
6 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You can get through anything if you keep going one point at a time.
Arthur Ashe