← Search

Kara Tringali

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
147 matches · 78W–69L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Kara Tringali to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history147 matches
W
2026-09-02 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Wooten
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
L
2026-08-26 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W
2026-08-25 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-20 · APurmort (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Diaz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 5-7
W
2026-07-08 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L
2026-07-01 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Taylor Stone mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 4-6
L
2026-06-29 · APurmort (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Collin Lohnes mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 5-7
W
2026-05-27 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L
2026-05-18 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Diaz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-04-15 · BBaker (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brittany Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 7-6
L
2026-04-01 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 5-7
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
71.1%
32W–13L · 55.5% of games
3.5
45.5%
20W–24L · 50.8% of games
5.5
80%
4W–1L · 78.1% of games
6.5
56%
14W–11L · 55.3% of games
3.0mixed
50%
2W–2L · 57.1% of games
3.5mixed
0%
0W–7L · 28% of games
6.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 47% of games
7.0mixed
20%
1W–4L · 35% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 37% of the time
#1 Doubles
37%
55 matches
#2 Doubles
19%
28 matches
#2 Singles
17%
25 matches
#1 Singles
15%
22 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
10 matches
#3 Singles
3%
4 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams