← Search

Abbey Ellis

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
92 matches · 49W–43L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Abbey Ellis to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history92 matches
L
2026-08-20 · SChudgar (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 7.5 · with Carol Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · CTharp (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Paige Cardell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-08 · JMorse (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Clayton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-07-20 · JMorse (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Lucio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 2-6
L
2026-07-19 · JMorse (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with John Clayton mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-16 · BDavis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shefali Chudgar
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
W
2026-07-08 · BDavis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pauline Styers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-2, 0-0
L
2026-07-01 · BDavis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pauline Styers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
W
2026-06-29 · JMorse (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Lucio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-10 · BDavis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pauline Styers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 7-6, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · JMorse (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Brandon Lucio mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
L
2026-05-31 · JMorse (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Ivan Blakeney mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 6-1, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams23 teams · 2022–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
50%
5W–5L · 52.9% of games
3.5
60.5%
23W–15L · 54.6% of games
4.0
25%
2W–6L · 40.6% of games
6.5
66.7%
8W–4L · 56.4% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.9% of games
7.0mixed
16.7%
1W–5L · 47.9% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 58% of the time
#1 Doubles
58%
53 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
27 matches
#3 Doubles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
2%
2 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer