← Search

Tiffany Schenberger

Charlotte, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
27 matches · 14W–13L · seasons 2025–2026

Captains: add Tiffany Schenberger to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history27 matches
L
2026-09-07 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kait Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 4-6
W
2026-08-12 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Annie Hart
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-3
W
2026-07-16 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Broemel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
L
2026-07-02 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
L
2026-07-02 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lauren Smith
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-7
W
2026-06-24 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-06-17 · #3 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-2
L
2026-06-06 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Broemel
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-4, 0-1
W
2026-05-29 · #2 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 7-5
L
2026-05-28 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kait Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L
2026-05-20 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 6-7
W
2026-04-29 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kait Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-3
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams6 teams · 2025–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level2 levels played
3.5
47.6%
10W–11L · 54.2% of games
6.5
66.7%
4W–2L · 57.5% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 44% of the time
#1 Doubles
44%
12 matches
#2 Doubles
37%
10 matches
#2 Singles
11%
3 matches
#1 Singles
4%
1 match
#3 Singles
4%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams