← Search

Allison Broemel

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
159 matches · 67W–92L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Allison Broemel to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history159 matches
W
2026-09-08 · ABroemel (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marissa Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-07 · ABroemel (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Stacy Melton
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
W
2026-08-25 · KDavis/ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carrie Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
W
2026-08-18 · KDavis/ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carrie Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 7-5
W
2026-08-18 · ABroemel (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Marissa Connolly
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 6-1
W
2026-08-10 · KDavis/ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 5.5 · with Carrie Allen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-3
L
2026-08-05 · ABroemel (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kelsey Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
W
2026-07-30 · KDavis (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Lincoln Eppard mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 6-1
W
2026-07-29 · ABroemel (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Patricia Stichnoth
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 6-2
L
2026-07-22 · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · KDavis (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Aaron Foreman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-07-16 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Tiffany Schenberger
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level6 levels played
3.0
36.5%
23W–40L · 46.2% of games
3.5
34.4%
11W–21L · 44.4% of games
5.5
66.7%
16W–8L · 57.8% of games
6.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 50.2% of games
3.0mixed
38.5%
5W–8L · 42.4% of games
6.0mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 38.7% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 46% of the time
#1 Doubles
46%
73 matches
#2 Doubles
25%
40 matches
#3 Doubles
24%
38 matches
#1 Female Doubles
3%
4 matches
#3 Singles
2%
3 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

It’s one of the reasons why I like tennis so much. Because you have to figure it out on your own.
Roger Federer