← Search

Jami Stone

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
184 matches · 93W–91L · seasons 2022–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
3.12
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 39 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
6%
stay 3.0
94%
up to 3.5
Projected to December: 0% down · 46% stay · 54% up, from a year-end estimate of 3.01. Lower than today’s 3.12 because form regresses — players this far above their band partway through a season have historically finished nearer the middle of it. Keep playing at this level and the numbers above are the ones that hold.

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the top of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Charlotte · 3.0
55 of 115
NC · 3.0
79 of 189
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
Jami is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Jami has played at 2.5, 3.0 across 5 seasons — 1 move up and 0 down.

2.02.53.020222023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, Jami has gone from the 1st to the 76th percentile of players at that level, 2022 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level9 levels played
2.5
50%
9W–9L · 51.8% of games
3.0
57.4%
35W–26L · 54% of games
3.5
40%
12W–18L · 46% of games
4.0
70%
7W–3L · 55.6% of games
5.5
57.1%
8W–6L · 56.1% of games
6.5
40.9%
9W–13L · 46.8% of games
3.0mixed
71.4%
10W–4L · 61.5% of games
3.5mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 40% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history184 matches
L
Kim Giusti / Cara Babb
2026-08-02 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Lindsay Lillibridge
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
Marie Foley / Kelly Wolff
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma SEGAL
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-1
L
2026-07-27 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with PATRICK TIGHE
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W
Kathy Aitken / Eloy ROYmixed
2026-07-20 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with PATRICK TIGHE
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-2
W
Nanci Weil / Donald Ford IImixed
2026-07-19 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Indranil Bhattacharya
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-4, 4-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-17 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Katie White
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
7-5, 6-4
W
Margot Bizon / Sara Beth Tindall
2026-07-17 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Shanin Trivanovic
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-3
W
Shannon Hemker / Jennifer Hall
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Emma SEGAL
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
W
Diane Hancock / Jennifer Harling
2026-07-06 · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Rachel Miller
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L
Julianne Gray / Jennifer McCoy
2026-07-06 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Monica Larios
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W
Andre Powell / Mandy Occhipintimixed
2026-06-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with PATRICK TIGHE
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-4
W
Chelsea Caudill / Rachel Bardin
2026-06-26 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Paulina Coello
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-4, 6-1
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.