← Search

Tano Failla

Matthews, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
105 matches · 57W–48L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Tano Failla to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history105 matches
W
2026-08-31 · JDichak (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Bennett Terada
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 6-1
W
2026-08-03 · JDichak (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Joseph Dichak
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W
2026-07-27 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jurga Petrikis mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L
2026-07-20 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Failla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-07-13 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Heidi Casey mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 5-7
L
2026-06-15 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kelly Failla mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 3-6
W
2026-06-08 · MWolf/TFailla (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Rhonda Tate mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
Lawrence Kraujalis / Jason Young
2026-05-19 · #2 Doubles · with John Girard championship
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-05-05 · BGibson (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clarke Hobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 7-5
W
2026-04-14 · BGibson (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with John Girard
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-04-13 · PSofarelli (WSRC) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 0-6
W
2026-03-31 · BGibson (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clarke Hobson
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams38 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
78.6%
22W–6L · 61% of games
3.5
27.8%
5W–13L · 44% of games
6.5
50%
11W–11L · 52.1% of games
7.5
0W–1L
not enough matches yet
3.0mixed
44.4%
4W–5L · 49.4% of games
6.0mixed
46.2%
6W–7L · 51.4% of games
7.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
7.5mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
46 matches
#2 Doubles
34%
36 matches
#1 Doubles
14%
15 matches
#2 Singles
3%
3 matches
#3 Singles
3%
3 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

What matters isn’t how well you play when you’re playing well. What matters is how well you play when you’re playing badly.
Martina Navratilova