← Search

Jacqui Gentile

Matthews, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
200 matches · 101W–99L · seasons 2019–2026

Captains: add Jacqui Gentile to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history200 matches
W
2026-09-14 · SDickson (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Ovendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-09-09 · MWolf/JShelley (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Kathleen O'Donnell
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
Melissa Orr / Shannon Burke
2026-08-26 · MWolf/JShelley (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Vickie Koskinas
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-1
L
2026-08-24 · SDickson (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Nicole Rizzieri
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
Lisa Long / Laura Richards
2026-08-21 · ACutts (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brandi Hoover
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 2-6
W
2026-08-12 · MWolf/JShelley (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Michele Ovendorf
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-07-29 · SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with MAGESH ARUMUGAM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/A
2026-07-13 · SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC) · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with MAGESH ARUMUGAM mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
W
2026-07-07 · BGibson (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clarke Hobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
W
2026-06-16 · BGibson (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clarke Hobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-1
W
2026-06-09 · BGibson (WSRC) · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Clarke Hobson mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC) · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Young mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 2-6
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams52 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level7 levels played
3.0
50%
19W–19L · 49.6% of games
3.5
25%
13W–39L · 41.7% of games
6.5
65%
26W–14L · 55.2% of games
3.0mixed
70.8%
17W–7L · 60.2% of games
6.0mixed
93.3%
14W–1L · 73.3% of games
7.0mixed
40%
2W–3L · 50% of games
7.5mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 45% of the time
#3 Doubles
45%
89 matches
#2 Doubles
29%
58 matches
#1 Doubles
19%
38 matches
#2 Singles
5%
9 matches
#1 Singles
2%
4 matches
#3 Singles
1%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You always want to win. That is why you play tennis, because you love the sport and try to be the best you can.
Roger Federer