← Search

MAGESH ARUMUGAM

Matthews, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
122 matches · 70W–52L · seasons 2023–2026
Bump probability
2.53.03.5lowhigh
Where this rating stands today. Taller means more likely.
i
The dashed lines are the edges of your band. The three shaded areas are exactly the three percentages below — area here is the chance of one outcome for you, not a count of players.
2.81
estimated dynamic rating
Where the rating sits now, on 22 matches this season · USTA never publishes this number
0%
down to 2.5
99%
stay 3.0
1%
up to 3.5

A 3.0 runs from 2.51 to 3.00. This rating sits in the upper half of the band, and every match moves it.

Our estimate, not a USTA figure.
i
scale measured at this point of 2023 on 2160 players. It moves when you play, and occasionally when we improve the model. USTA publishes year-end ratings in December, which is when this gets graded against what actually happened.
Where you rank
Matthews · 3.0
30 of 31
NC · 3.0
175 of 189
By our estimated rating, not the published level.
i
MAGESH is ranked against players at the same level in the same place. The published level is identical for everyone in a band, so it cannot separate them — our estimate can. Groups smaller than five are not ranked at all, because a placing out of two is noise dressed as standing.
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

MAGESH has been 3.0 for all 4 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the middle of the band to the top.

2.53.02023202420252026

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history.

How you rank at your level
At 3.0, MAGESH has gone from the 59th to the 21st percentile of players at that level, 2023 to 2026.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level5 levels played
3.0
58.9%
33W–23L · 54.7% of games
4.0
50%
3W–3L · 52.9% of games
6.5
44.4%
12W–15L · 48.4% of games
3.0mixed
68.2%
15W–7L · 59.9% of games
6.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history122 matches
L
Jeffrey Phillips / Sarah Bardenmixed
2026-07-30 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Kristyn Atkins
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-5, 6-3
W
Kate MacRone / Philip Myersmixed
2026-07-29 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqui Gentile
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L
Hailey Foreman / Aaron Foremanmixed
2026-07-16 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Madonna
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W
N/Amixed
2026-07-13 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqui Gentile
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
Trisha Smith / Kenneth Godfreymixed
2026-07-09 · #2 Doubles · 3.0 · with Amanda Eagan
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-1
W
Lena Patel / Alejandro Sanchezmixed
2026-06-15 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Gabriela ROY
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-1, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Courtney Warner
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 6-1
L
2026-06-04 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Laurie Madonna
+0.000about as expected — took 25% of games against 29% expected
6-2, 6-2
W
Perry Pao / Hilary Diodatomixed
2026-05-28 · #1 Doubles · 3.0 · with Stacey Herndon
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-2, 6-3
W
Nicolas Savelieff / Linda Burks-Adamsmixed
2026-05-18 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Jacqui Gentile
mixed — doesn't count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 7-5
W
Jason Spires
2026-05-14 · #1 Singles · 3.0
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-1, 6-3
L
Joey Chen / Chuck Geer
2026-04-30 · #3 Doubles · 3.0 · with Justin Young
expectation pending — we're still fetching an opponent's record
6-2, 6-2
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.