← Search

Shefali Chudgar

Belmont, NC
3.5C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
67 matches · 26W–41L · seasons 2023–2026

Captains: add Shefali Chudgar to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history67 matches
L
2026-09-03 · SChudgar (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 7.5 · with Barbara Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-7, 0-1
L
2026-08-20 · SChudgar (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 7.5 · with Nicole Badr
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-16 · BDavis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abbey Ellis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-7, 6-1, 0-1
L
2026-07-08 · BDavis (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 2-6
W
2026-06-24 · BDavis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Abitha Begum Mohammed Sherfudeen
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
W
2026-06-06 · BDavis (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Pauline Styers
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L
2026-04-29 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
7-5, 3-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-01 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Diane Hancock
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 4-6
L
2026-03-25 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #1 Singles · 3.5
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 0-6
W
2026-03-18 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sydney Gaston
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W
2026-03-11 · ABroemel (Jeff Adams) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kait Beck
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 7-5
W
2026-01-05 · SChudgar (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Carol Davis
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams13 teams · 2023–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level5 levels played
3.5
46.2%
18W–21L · 47.6% of games
4.0
20%
1W–4L · 43.3% of games
6.5
42.9%
3W–4L · 45.9% of games
7.5
16.7%
2W–10L · 37.6% of games
3.5mixed
50%
2W–2L · 48.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 51% of the time
#1 Doubles
51%
34 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
19 matches
#3 Doubles
19%
13 matches
#1 Singles
2%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Every match is a story with a beginning, a middle and an end, and you are writing it as you go.
Chris Evert