← Search

Danielle Gier

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
100 matches · 47W–53L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Danielle Gier to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history100 matches
L
2026-09-09 · BBaker (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-07-21 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Mayo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-20 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Mayo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 3-6
L
2026-06-15 · APurmort (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 0-6
W
2026-04-29 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W
2026-04-15 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 6-2
L
2026-04-01 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 5-7
L
2026-03-11 · BBaker (Park Road) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Allison Purmort
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 5-7
L
2026-02-11 · APurmort (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 3.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L
2025-10-01 · APurmort (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
2-6, 4-6
L
2025-09-24 · APurmort (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 4-6
W
2025-09-17 · APurmort (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Sally Licandro
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-3, 6-4
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams30 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
53.7%
22W–19L · 49.5% of games
3.5
40%
8W–12L · 42.7% of games
5.5
75%
3W–1L · 60% of games
6.5
29.4%
5W–12L · 43.6% of games
3.0mixed
3W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
42.9%
3W–4L · 42.6% of games
6.0mixed
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
7.0mixed
0W–3L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
38 matches
#2 Doubles
33%
33 matches
#3 Doubles
18%
18 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#3 Singles
4%
4 matches
#1 Singles
2%
2 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

Pressure is a privilege.
Billie Jean King