← Search

Anna Sison

Add to scout listFree account. Monday email when they play.
Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2024
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
129 matches · 70W–59L · seasons 2021–2026
Match history129 matches
L
2026-09-30 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-09-29 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Virginia Wooten
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 7-6, 0-1
W
2026-09-16 · BBaker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
7-6, 1-6, 1-0
W
2026-09-09 · BBaker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Morgan Lee
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-2
W
2026-09-08 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Allison Purmort
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-3, 6-3
W
2026-09-02 · BBaker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-09-01 · ABroemel (Queens) · #1 Doubles · 6.5 · with Rachel Miller
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 3-6
L
2026-08-12 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Spencer Stoakley
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
4-6, 1-6
W
Default
2026-07-29 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Whelan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-22 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Michael Chaffman mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-7, 7-5, 0-1
L
2026-06-08 · CJacobs/NBadr (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Timothy Whelan mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
2-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-29 · BBaker (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Kathy Kopec
loading the estimate
6-3, 3-6, 0-1
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams36 teams · 2020–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level9 levels played
2.5
75%
3W–1L · 56.3% of games
3.0
56.1%
23W–18L · 51.2% of games
3.5
30%
6W–14L · 50.3% of games
5.5
100%
7W–0L · 75.9% of games
6.5
54.1%
20W–17L · 50.5% of games
3.0mixed
2W–0L
not enough matches yet
3.5mixed
28.6%
2W–5L · 48.3% of games
6.0mixed
70%
7W–3L · 59.9% of games
7.0mixed
0W–1L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #1 Doubles, 38% of the time
#1 Doubles
38%
49 matches
#2 Doubles
28%
36 matches
#3 Doubles
23%
29 matches
#3 Singles
5%
7 matches
#2 Singles
4%
5 matches
#1 Singles
2%
3 matches

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

I really think a champion is defined not by their wins but by how they can recover when they fall.
Serena Williams