← Search

Spencer Stoakley

Charlotte, NC
3.0C year-end 2025
i
Computer — generated by the USTA algorithm from match play
93 matches · 29W–64L · seasons 2021–2026

Captains: add Spencer Stoakley to your scout list and get a weekly note on what they did. Create a free account to start one.

Match history93 matches
W
2026-09-02 · BBaker (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Sison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-0, 6-2
L
2026-08-19 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Brittany Baker
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 0-6
L
2026-08-12 · BBaker (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 6.5 · with Anna Sison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
4-6, 1-6
L
2026-07-21 · APurmort (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
W
N/A
2026-06-29 · APurmort (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Robert Byrd mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
6-0, 6-0
L
2026-06-08 · APurmort (Queens) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Jonathan Diaz mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
1-6, 2-6
L
2026-05-18 · APurmort (Queens) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Peter Mayo mixed
doesn’t count toward your NTRP rating
3-6, 1-6
L
2026-04-22 · BBaker (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
1-6, 4-6
L
2026-04-15 · BBaker (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Anna Sison
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L
2026-04-01 · BBaker (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
0-6, 3-6
L
2026-03-18 · BBaker (Park Road) · #2 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
3-6, 2-6
W
2026-03-11 · BBaker (Park Road) · #3 Doubles · 3.5 · with Elizabeth Miars
expectation pending — we’re still fetching an opponent’s record
6-2, 3-6, 1-0
Where you rank locallyagainst everyone at your level
Teams26 teams · 2021–2026
Over timerating by season, and how you rank
By level8 levels played
3.0
40%
10W–15L · 44.5% of games
3.5
22.2%
4W–14L · 38.1% of games
5.5
2W–1L
not enough matches yet
6.5
33.3%
8W–16L · 44.5% of games
3.0mixed
60%
3W–2L · 58.2% of games
3.5mixed
12.5%
1W–7L · 30.3% of games
6.0mixed
25%
1W–3L · 43.5% of games
7.0mixed
0%
0W–4L · 25.8% of games

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

By lineusually #3 Doubles, 44% of the time
#3 Doubles
44%
41 matches
#2 Doubles
32%
30 matches
#1 Doubles
11%
10 matches
#3 Singles
7%
6 matches
#2 Singles
5%
5 matches
#1 Singles
1%
1 match

How often, across every team and every match we hold — including ones that do not count toward a rating. Advanced stats has a court-position table too, and it answers a different question: how well you do there, over matches that count. A team’s own page shows how that one team uses you.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.

You have to believe in the long term plan you have but you need the short term goals to motivate and inspire you.
Roger Federer